Editor's note: A lawyer and member of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) Chukwuemeka Iroanya (IPOB) has condemned the ruling made by a Federal High Court sitting in Abuja on an application for protection of witnesses in the trial of Nnamdi Kanu.
Iroanya in his piece highlighted why the IPOB leader cannot be subjected to a 'secret trial' by the Nigerian government.
Kanu had during a court process reject the ruling of the court on protection of DSS witnesses
Without any shred of doubt, Hon. Justice Binta Fatimat Murtala-Nyako (57 years old) is a monumental disgrace to the Judiciary and the greatest purveyor of injustice ever known to man.
The world must be put on notice that this female Judge lacks basic understanding of her job as well as the capability to differentiate between a private citizen and a public servant at the level of the President of a country.
In her gaffe on the 1st of December 2016 which was the day she denied bail for Nnamdi Kanu, Justice Binta Murtala-Nyako averred that Muhammadu Buhari’s prejudicial statement on Nnamdi Kanu’s case during his Presidential media chat of December 30, 2015, was a mere comment from a private citizen which he (Buhari) is entitled to as part of his fundamental human right.
We are not surprised that on the night of the same day of her gaffe, Justice Binta Murtala-Nyako had a dinner at the Presidential Villa with Muhammadu Buhari.
It is on record that Muhammadu Buhari has written four letters to Justice Binta Murtala-Nyako concerning Nnamdi Kanu.
In one of the recent letters, Buhari reminded Justice Binta Murtala-Nyako that her eldest son was implicated in a fraud involving her husband.
0 comments:
Post a Comment